Tall Timbers

On this page:

  1. Energy efficient design first
  2. Protect old growth and biodiversity hotspots
  3. Wood is strong
  4. Save the world with wood?
  5. Faster means less labour costs
  6. Fire?
  7. Mud brick, straw bale, rammed earth and all that

1. Energy efficient design first

We cannot sacrifice energy efficiency just to use some trendy new material. As we saw on my Energy Efficient page:

While energy embodied in materials and construction activities is important, operational energy demand still dominates over a building’s lifetime energy use.

It’s more important to save energy use over the building’s lifetime than to compromise energy efficiency of the building just to use some trendy new material. If the new material cannot support a passive solar design, short term embodied energy gains are quickly swamped by excessive energy use gains over the building’s lifetime.

2. Protect old growth and biodiversity hotspots

While timber is a great renewable material, we must protect biodiversity hotspots and old growth forests. Some forests and tropical jungles have threatened bugs and plants and insects and mammals and birds. We must protect these at all costs. Personally I would ban logging from all remaining old growth forests and encourage fast growing bamboo and hemp and other wood alternatives to meet any gaps in the paper fibre markets. Then we should establish a vast new tree farm industry to meet the growing populations’ need for future housing. (Bamboo is not yet certified for Cross Laminated Timbre discussed below, so would mainly be used to take the pressure off trees for the paper and other fibre markets, not the skyscraper market).

3. Wood is strong

As The Economist says:

March 22nd saw the topping-out ceremony of the tallest contemporary wood building in the world, and the first that might be considered a true skyscraper, the 30m Wood Innovation and Design Centre (pictured) in Prince George, British Columbia. Its designer, Michael Green, says, “Frankly, we aren’t breaking a sweat. It’s only public perception and emotion trumping science that stalls us moving higher.” He hopes to start work on a 20-storey vertical food-farm in Vancouver later this year.

They built Lifecycle Tower One in Dornbin in 8 days. It’s 8 stories high. The floors were laid in 8 days, and then it was ‘dressed’ in a simple façade.

There are plans to go higher. Much higher. As Inhabitat reports:

The latest addition to the burgeoning field comes from Danish design firm C.F. Møller, who just won HSB Stockholm’s architectural competition! The firm designed a solar-powered 34-story residential building made mostly of wood with a concrete core and rooftop garden terraces.

Big Wood, C.F. Møller, wood skyscraper, wood high-rise, Stockholm

4. Save the world with wood?

It might sound like an exaggeration, but anything that might sequester huge volumes of CO2 out of the atmosphere for centuries is a major ‘wedge’ against climate change. Wood can do this, and more! Watch Michael Green’s TED talk on wood in skyscrapers!

  • 3 billion or 3,000,000,000 people require new housing in the next 20 years!
  • This is 100,000 new homes each and every day
  • Michael claims that rammed earth and adobe projects are mainly rural or suburban solutions, not the high density, fast to deploy pre-fab construction we so urgently need.
  • 15% of the world lives a first world population and builds the majority of floor space today, but 85% are living in alternative or sub standard accommodation.
  • Buildings use:
    • 20% of our water,
    • 25% to 40% of our energy,
    • 30 to 40% of greenhouse gases,
    • 24% to 40% of solid waste generation,
    • we make 3 tons of concrete per person on earth each year,
    • airlines emit 1% of world carbon, shipping does 3%, 15% is all transportation,
    • but 5-8% of all our carbon emissions comes from concrete alone!

This ABC podcast architect Michael also unpacks some other building statistics.

  • He uses Aspen and Birch trees that are shredded and the fibres glued together
  • Trees are only 10 to 15 years old when harvested
  • Apart from the foundations, wood can replace the use of steel and concrete in buildings and becomes the new structural backbone of the skyscraper!
  • Huge wood beams are now 20m long by 2.5m wide by 85mil thick
  • Wood weighs half as much as concrete which improves the strength of the building in an earthquake
  • Wood buildings have survived earthquakes better than heavy steel and concrete buildings
  • Can lead to an enormous reforesting business worldwide, and an enormous sequestration of Co2!
  • As a material the wood is more expensive but …
  • It drastically reduces the labour costs associated with buildings as it can go up so much faster.

5. Faster means less labour costs

See Cree construction group here.
Their 4 minute youtube video shows their primarily wooden prefab units allowing one story to be constructed every day. Imagine a 30 story apartment going up in a month, and locking in all that carbon for centuries!

Landline also explains how wood is becoming more affordable and faster to construct.

LISA MARTY: It’s a lightweight construction tool and it can be put together very quickly. The CLT product enables buildings to go up a lot more quickly than concrete. For instance, I understand the Forte Building was built in two thirds the time of an equivalent concrete structure. It’s also very carbon friendly. Concrete or steel building is often a net emitter of carbon and a wood frame building is often a net store.

Fire engineer Robert Gerard from ARUP says:

From a financial perspective, developers are starting to acknowledge the benefits of tall wood construction using prefabricated elements because it reduces construction times and costs. So that’s ultimately what’s driving the push. And I think that as governments continue to quantify sustainability costs through credits, rebates, and upholding energy and carbon standards, it makes the business case to support timber as the primary structural material even stronger. And architects are driven to wood by the sustainability benefits and increased design flexibility.

Gizmodo says:

At London’s Stadthaus, a team of four put the first eight floors of structure together in less than a month. The entire building was finished in less than a year.


6. Fire?

Robert goes on to explain:

Another major test was recently published by a group called FPInnovations in Canada. They tested CLT panels as walls and floors to demonstrate that the panels have a certain level of fire performance comparable to non-combustible building elements like concrete, for example.

The tests showed the walls and floors could be designed for up to three hours of fire resistance, in many cases exceeding the code requirement for structural element fire resistance ratings. As a result, the use of CLT has been adopted into the prescriptive building codes in the US and Canada. The researchers were able to present this information to the code councils and request changes in the building codes based on the demonstrated performance through fire testing.


Inhabitat again:

One of the first things that comes to mind when someone mentions a wood skyscraper is the risk of fire, but the architects maintain that wood is more fire-safe than other common building materials. “Wood is also more fire resistant than both steel and concrete,” they explain. “This is due to 15% of wood mass being water, which will evaporate before the wood actually burns. In addition, logs get charred which protects the core.” Over at TreeHugger, Lloyd Alter punctures that assertion a bit, suggesting that calling wood more fire resistant that concrete is a stretch.

And as to fire protection, it turns out that these timber columns could actually be better than steel in a fire. While the panels will burn, they won’t fail catastrophically like steel does when it gets very hot. Timber stays stable for longer because it forms a layer of insulating char when it’s exposed to flame. And while it’s not fireproof, it’s far harder to burn than raw wood, since it’s industrially treated and is rarely left exposed. “In Europe, cross-laminated timber has been around long enough that standards for issues like fire protection and acoustics are being incorporated into building codes,”explained The New York Times in 2012.

7. Mud brick, straw bale, rammed earth and all that

Given that 3 billion people require housing in the next 20 years, we’re going to be building New Urbanism of at least 5 stories, minimum. Materials that cannot achieve this safely are not recommended. I have not seen evidence that straw-bale, mud bricks, adobe, and even tyres in Earthships can meet modern architectural and safety standards yet (May 2017).  My main reference is one brief mention of a Queensland hotel of rammed earth to 5 storeys, so without more peer-reviewed architectural reviews of these materials, I cannot support wholesale adoption. New Urbanism comes first, materials second. And as timber can easily meet the 5 story limit in beautiful forms that we are familiar with, I’m happy with that!

Wood Innovation and Design Centre, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada



Other New Urban pages:-

Benefits of New Urbanism

More details on New Urbanism, further defining the neighbourhood, town, city, and showing how driving to the town square ruins it, the historical legacy of racist highway development, and how developers want to ruin public spaces.

The Eco-city, bunched in more and covered in trees and bushes.

The Sky-City, 17,000 people in one building!

The Eco-Village: the opposite of the above!

Village towns: incorporating agriculture

Which style for Sydney?

Rail: is so much better than cars

How to get there, given we’ve already spend so much on suburbia?

Objections to New Urbanism:

  1. That’s so typical of Nazi Greenie Control Freaks telling us how to live!
  2. It’s just lefty propaganda — suburbia is the American way
  3. Cities are ugly!
  4. What do we do with the vast suburban areas we’ve already built?
  5. How do we pay for all this?

Energy efficient homes

Tall timbers: modern CLT lets us build skyscrapers out of wood!

Fast homes: Don’t eco-apartments take a year or so to build, and cities take decades?

  • Assembly line homes
  • Cities transformed in 20 years

1 Response to Tall Timbers

  1. Rusty Mason says:

    Wood is less likely to burn or fail than steel or concrete? Because of water evaporation? Never heard that before.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s