Tall Timbers

Once upon a time New Urbanism and ecocities were limited to 8 stories tall, from a carbon  point of view. Skyscrapers required so much extra steel and concrete above 8 stories that any CO2 savings were lost. It was just not worth it. But now, WOOD can build 30 to 40 stories tall!

I can now embrace lofty 30 to 40 story Ecocity designs in the confidence that they’re not going to cost the climate extra carbon emissions, but instead will sequester that carbon away for as long as the buildings last. The newest high-tech construction material for skyscrapers is… wood!

On this page:

  1. Wood is strong
  2. Save the world with wood?
  3. Faster means less labour costs
  4. Fire?

1. Wood is strong

As The Economist says:

March 22nd saw the topping-out ceremony of the tallest contemporary wood building in the world, and the first that might be considered a true skyscraper, the 30m Wood Innovation and Design Centre (pictured) in Prince George, British Columbia. Its designer, Michael Green, says, “Frankly, we aren’t breaking a sweat. It’s only public perception and emotion trumping science that stalls us moving higher.” He hopes to start work on a 20-storey vertical food-farm in Vancouver later this year.

They built Lifecycle Tower One in Dornbin in 8 days. It’s 8 stories high. The floors were laid in 8 days, and then it was ‘dressed’ in a simple façade.

There are plans to go higher. Much higher. As Inhabitat reports:

The latest addition to the burgeoning field comes from Danish design firm C.F. Møller, who just won HSB Stockholm’s architectural competition! The firm designed a solar-powered 34-story residential building made mostly of wood with a concrete core and rooftop garden terraces.

Big Wood, C.F. Møller, wood skyscraper, wood high-rise, Stockholm

2. Save the world with wood?

It might sound like an exaggeration, but anything that might sequester huge volumes of CO2 out of the atmosphere for centuries is a major ‘wedge’ against climate change. Wood can do this, and more! Watch Michael Green’s TED talk on wood in skyscrapers!

  • 3 billion or 3,000,000,000 people require new housing in the next 20 years!
  • This is 100,000 new homes each and every day
  • Michael claims that rammed earth and adobe projects are mainly rural or suburban solutions, not the high density, fast to deploy pre-fab construction we so urgently need.
  • 15% of the world lives a first world population and builds the majority of floor space today, but 85% are living in alternative or sub standard accommodation.
  • Buildings use:
    • 20% of our water,
    • 25% to 40% of our energy,
    • 30 to 40% of greenhouse gases,
    • 24% to 40% of solid waste generation,
    • we make 3 tons of concrete per person on earth each year,
    • airlines emit 1% of world carbon, shipping does 3%, 15% is all transportation,
    • but 5-8% of all our carbon emissions comes from concrete alone!

This ABC podcast architect Michael also unpacks some other building statistics.

  • He uses Aspen and Birch trees that are shredded and the fibres glued together
  • Trees are only 10 to 15 years old when harvested
  • Apart from the foundations, wood can replace the use of steel and concrete in buildings and becomes the new structural backbone of the skyscraper!
  • Huge wood beams are now 20m long by 2.5m wide by 85mil thick
  • Wood weighs half as much as concrete which improves the strength of the building in an earthquake
  • Wood buildings have survived earthquakes better than heavy steel and concrete buildings
  • Can lead to an enormous reforesting business worldwide, and an enormous sequestration of Co2!
  • As a material the wood is more expensive but …
  • It drastically reduces the labour costs associated with buildings as it can go up so much faster.

3. Faster means less labour costs

See Cree construction group here.
Their 4 minute youtube video shows their primarily wooden prefab units allowing one story to be constructed every day. Imagine a 30 story apartment going up in a month, and locking in all that carbon for centuries!

Landline also explains how wood is becoming more affordable and faster to construct.

LISA MARTY: It’s a lightweight construction tool and it can be put together very quickly. The CLT product enables buildings to go up a lot more quickly than concrete. For instance, I understand the Forte Building was built in two thirds the time of an equivalent concrete structure. It’s also very carbon friendly. Concrete or steel building is often a net emitter of carbon and a wood frame building is often a net store.

Fire engineer Robert Gerard from ARUP says:

From a financial perspective, developers are starting to acknowledge the benefits of tall wood construction using prefabricated elements because it reduces construction times and costs. So that’s ultimately what’s driving the push. And I think that as governments continue to quantify sustainability costs through credits, rebates, and upholding energy and carbon standards, it makes the business case to support timber as the primary structural material even stronger. And architects are driven to wood by the sustainability benefits and increased design flexibility.

Gizmodo says:

At London’s Stadthaus, a team of four put the first eight floors of structure together in less than a month. The entire building was finished in less than a year.


4. Fire?

Robert goes on to explain:

Another major test was recently published by a group called FPInnovations in Canada. They tested CLT panels as walls and floors to demonstrate that the panels have a certain level of fire performance comparable to non-combustible building elements like concrete, for example.

The tests showed the walls and floors could be designed for up to three hours of fire resistance, in many cases exceeding the code requirement for structural element fire resistance ratings. As a result, the use of CLT has been adopted into the prescriptive building codes in the US and Canada. The researchers were able to present this information to the code councils and request changes in the building codes based on the demonstrated performance through fire testing.

Inhabitat again:

One of the first things that comes to mind when someone mentions a wood skyscraper is the risk of fire, but the architects maintain that wood is more fire-safe than other common building materials. “Wood is also more fire resistant than both steel and concrete,” they explain. “This is due to 15% of wood mass being water, which will evaporate before the wood actually burns. In addition, logs get charred which protects the core.” Over at TreeHugger, Lloyd Alter punctures that assertion a bit, suggesting that calling wood more fire resistant that concrete is a stretch.

And as to fire protection, it turns out that these timber columns could actually be better than steel in a fire. While the panels will burn, they won’t fail catastrophically like steel does when it gets very hot. Timber stays stable for longer because it forms a layer of insulating char when it’s exposed to flame. And while it’s not fireproof, it’s far harder to burn than raw wood, since it’s industrially treated and is rarely left exposed. “In Europe, cross-laminated timber has been around long enough that standards for issues like fire protection and acoustics are being incorporated into building codes,”explained The New York Times in 2012.

More pages on New Urbanism:-

1. What are the different styles of New Urbanism?

2. What are the common objections to New Urbanism?

  1. That’s so typical of Nazi Greenie Control Freaks telling us how to live!
  2. It’s just lefty propaganda — suburbia is the American way
  3. Cities are ugly!
  4. What do we do with the vast suburban areas we’ve already built?
  5. How do we pay for all this?

3. Where are these Eco-cities popping up?

4. Design priorities: what priorities shape our buildings in the first place?

5. Tall Timbers: the new state-of-the-art material for constructing skyscrapers at a rate of one floor per day is… wood!?

6. Earth works: shorter rural homes are built out of mud bricks, adobe,  rammed earth, cob, straw bales, and… car tyres!?

One Response to Tall Timbers

  1. Rusty Mason says:

    Wood is less likely to burn or fail than steel or concrete? Because of water evaporation? Never heard that before.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s