Draft: The structure will remain the same, but I might tinker with a few data points over the next few months of 2017. I announce significant updates to these summary pages on my blog, so you could subscribe there for blog news.
- An attractive town square: New Urbanism & the Gilmore Girls
- My suburb almost had it
- The war: the public space versus developers
- Driving to the town square ruins the town square
- My suburb could never have it
- The problems with suburban sprawl
- So what is New Urbanism, and how does it work?
- 3 minute video summary
- The Australian Council for New Urbanism definition
- A few notes from Wikipedia
- How to make an attractive city video
- James Howard Kunstler: how to build a culture worth caring about
- The 1950’s super-highway scheme that went racist
New Urbanism and the Gilmore Girls
We can literally build ourselves a better future by rediscovering lessons in town planning from the past. This claim is not a nostalgic appeal to the designs of yesteryear, but based on the latest studies into the profound benefits of good town planning that improves our traffic, economy, psychology, health, society and culture. Most arenas of life can be improved when you demand to live in neighbourhoods that have everything you need within a 5 minute walk. Your street will be more attractive and functional, your neighbourhood will be safer and more prosperous, and your local town square will become your favourite place to visit, a home away from home. But before I get carried away describing the many benefits of New Urbanism, I should try and describe what New Urbanism is.
What does New Urbanism look like physically? The first concept to get our heads around would be the town square, and a close comparison would be the fictional town of Stars Hollow from the Gilmore Girls. Other than the mother and daughter best friends, the show is about snobbery and authenticity, about class struggles and appearances contrasted with real people enjoying real relationships in each other’s lives. It’s no accident that this occurs in a town square where spontaneous interactions give the characters plenty of opportunity to meet. People grow to love Stars Hollow — Jimmy Fallon has said that if it existed, he would move there in an instant! If Gilmore Girls is not your show, then many other shows use the small town device to tell character stories, from Dawson’s Creek and Buffy the Vampire Slayer to Smallville. These are American examples, but if you prefer you can think about a historic town square in Europe. In Star’s Hollow you could go and sit in Luke’s diner and look out over the town square and enjoy the vibe of the place. I’m defining the New Urban town square as:-
“A culturally appropriate small park surrounded by walking distance shops and services.”
That’s the heart of New Urbanism, right there. A small square, no more than 30 metres by 30 metres, that meets most of the weekly needs of the local community. But New Urbanism is so much more than a small town. Instead it captures the local heart of the small town while plugging into the convenience of the big city.
Please watch the 3 minute video summary
These shows appeal to us because the writers can inject all sorts of quirky characters into the scene naturally. The layout of the town forces local people to interact as they go about their business, a coffee or getting a haircut or buying some groceries. The Gilmore Girls sit in the diner and are treated to Luke arguing with the town Mayor, or are amused by Kirk the local eccentric — or some other Stars Hollow action. It’s charming, and incredibly nostalgic because most of us simply don’t get to experience this kind of spontaneous, local fun. We just shop at the distant mega-mall, a place filled with strangers and devoid of soul.
What went wrong? We invented the car. After World War 2, we thought we would give every returning soldier a manor in the country. Those town planners had noble intentions, but it backfired. It did not create a rural setting plugged into the local economics and rhythms of rural life, it paved over it. There are many horrible consequences that we will explore below, but for me the fragmentation of place and community is by far the most offensive.
My suburb almost had a town square
I live in a peninsula suburb that actually has a small sense of community. I live in a quaint suburb on the North Shore of Sydney, surrounded by Australian bush reserves with only one road in and out. It has about 4300 people and manages to support a number of shops, restaurants, hairdressers, a kindergarten and even a local coffee shop a bit like Luke’s diner. Scattered elsewhere are 2 churches, a school, and 3 parks. The parks have their own doggy park communities and organise the occasional Friday night champagne picnics. The local shops sometimes have their own fairs.
But here’s the sad part. It could have been so much more if it was assembled together! The shops are strung along a suburban road, and the parks are shoved out the way elsewhere. These different functions of town life are all split up by car trips to each separate destination. Instead we should have put the park in the middle and surrounded it with all the shops, churches, schools and other amenities of public life. Then we could sit at our own ‘Luke’s diner’, and watch our neighbours walk their dogs, collect their dry-cleaning or play with their kids in the park. Unlike the anonymous mega-mall serving 300,000 people, these shops serve the locals. It helps meet our psychological need for connection. Why can’t my suburb have been laid out something like this? Shops, surrounding a town square. It’s not rocket science!
The war: the public space versus developers
New York city designer Amanda Burden explains the war between our rights as citizens for public spaces of beauty and comfort, and the constant battle of developers to commercialise the space.
Driving to the town square ruins the town square
The town square becomes impossible when building codes demand that every single building have a certain ratio of ‘free’ parking – which works out to be very expensive parking after all.
My suburb could never have it
First, it would require a significant car-park tower near one side of the town square, ruining the aesthetics of the space. Alternatively, a flat car park ruins the dimensions and walkability of the town square. Second, the typical excessive car-dependency of my suburb would have robbed the square of some of the spontaneous friendships that come from public transport and walking. You can’t talk to people who drive through the town square. Suburbia also has many other traps to avoid. The problems with suburban sprawl
As I see it suburbia:-
Wastes time: Suburbia creates traffic jams and wastes time. One of the greatest myths every fostered on us is the ‘convenience’ of a shopping mega-mall. We drive to the mall, drive around looking for parking, finally park, then after at least 15 minutes in the car still have to walk another 5 to 10 minutes through an oversized shopping mall to find the shop we are actually after! Compare that to New Urban neighbourhoods where almost everything you need on a weekly basis is within an attractive 5 to 7 minute walk. By comparison you could walk your granny trolley to the shops, buy fresh groceries, have a short catch up with a local, and walk back home before a suburbanite would have entered their first shop in the mega-mall!
Wastes money: suburbia wastes money in buying cars, lost productivity in traffic jams, negative mental health and even physical health impacts. Suburban driving replaces New Urban walking, and raises our blood pressure and cancer rates. But it also raises our municipal rates because less people are sprawled out over more area, requiring more roads, more gutters, more pavements, more plumbing, more street wiring, more lighting: in short, more of everything that makes this town plan expensive and wasteful!Creates social injustice: Suburban sprawl creates dependence on the car — the most expensive form of transport. This inconveniences the poor and infirm who cannot drive, or who must waste a disproportionate amount of money on taxis.
Destroys community: As I have already explained above, my pet hate is the effect on community. Shopping at a mega-mall that draws in 300,000 people is shopping with strangers. It’s a rare thing to meet someone you know. Suburbia isolates. There’s no ‘there’ there, no town centre, no soul. James M. McElfish of the Environmental Law Institute lists 10 problems with suburban sprawl. You can download his 12 page PDF here.
1. Sprawl development contributes to a loss of support for public facilities and public menities.
2. Sprawl undermines effective maintenance of existing infrastructure.
3. Sprawl increases societal costs for transportation.
4. Sprawl consumes more resources than other development patterns.
5. Sprawl separates urban poor people from jobs.
6. Sprawl imposes a tax on time.
7. Sprawl degrades water and air quality.
8. Sprawl results in the permanent alteration and destruction of habitats.
9. Sprawl creates difficulty in maintaining community.
10. Sprawl offers the promise of choice while only delivering more of the same.
Critics of sprawl maintain that sprawl erodes quality of life. Duany and Plater-Zyberk believe that in traditional neighborhoods the nearness of the workplace to retail and restaurant space that provides cafes and convenience stores with daytime customers is an essential component to the successful balance of urban life. Furthermore, they state that the closeness of the workplace to homes also gives people the option of walking or riding a bicycle to work or school and that without this kind of interaction between the different components of life the urban pattern quickly falls apart. (Duany Plater-Zyberk 6, 28).
So what is New Urbanism, and how does it work?
The Australian Council for New Urbanism definition:-
- a built environment which is diverse in use and population, scaled for the pedestrian, and capable of accommodating the automobile and public transport;
- a structure based on walkable neighbourhoods (400m radius/five minute walk) focussed on fine-grained mixed-use town and neighbourhood centres with a variety of higher density housing in close proximity;
- a well-defined and high quality public realm which is responsive to site features and ecology, and supported by a distinctive architecture reflecting the climate and culture of the region;
- a highly-interconnected street network, with traffic management to support pedestrians, cyclists and transit-users.
- From the ACNU New Urbanist PDF
Their illustration below shows the New Urban town plan.
- Circles = neighbourhoods with dwellings for 2000 people, 800m across.
- Dot in the middle = a neighbourhood park and preschool with a corner store (milk bar / hamburger joint). It’s only 400m radius from the edge of the neighbourhood to the park, about a 5 minute walk.
- Main roads shown as line through the middle = main road with a bus or tram route. (Smaller neighbourhood side streets are not shown.)
- Main street is the thick line in the middle, which is 400m long. (I of course prefer the town square design). The main street serves 8 surrounding neighbourhoods + the neighbourhood that encompasses the main street, creating a final catchment of 18,000 people.
- That will support a wide range of businesses, creating many jobs at the local level. And it’s all walkable, only 1.5 km from the furthest neighbourhood dwelling to the centre of the main street.
The American sustainability site Worldchanging says:-
Urban density is major element in the picture of a bright green future. Compact homes, closely situated, make a drastic difference in the all-around efficiency of a city, from energy to transportation to shopping for basic necessities. They also make it easy to skip driving and take transit or walk, which decreases pollution and improves physical health. Finally, they foster the creation of supportive community networks in which resources can be better shared and everyone feels safer. See this list of Worldchanging’s many New Urbanist articles.
A few notes from wikipedia
The wiki emphasises that New Urbanism is not always about a town square but at least has…
“a discernible centre. This is often a square or a green and sometimes a busy or memorable street corner. A transit stop would be located at this centre…
…There are a variety of dwelling types — usually houses, rowhouses, and apartments — so that younger and older people, singles and families, the poor and the wealthy may find places to live… At the edge of the neighbourhood, there are shops and offices of sufficiently varied types to supply the weekly needs of a household… There are small playgrounds accessible to every dwelling — not more than a tenth of a mile away… The neighbourhood is organized to be self-governing. A formal association debates and decides matters of maintenance, security, and physical change.”
How to make an Attractive City?
Excellent video: 14 minutes that describes the rules and principles that makes a city not only functional, but beautiful and attractive and a place of historical value.
James Howard Kunstler: how to build a culture worth caring about!
James Howard Kunstler presents the aesthetic and design catastrophe of suburbia, and the solutions in New Urbanism. He asks if we let suburbia steal the soul of the neighbourhood, is a nation even worth defending? He briefly mentions the link between soldiers dying in Iraq just to free up the supply of oil that maintains suburbia. What goes through their mind as they “spill their blood in the sand”? Is it the ugly billboards and Golden Arches on the side of the highway? Or worse, is it that they don’t even know what they’re really fighting for? Suburbia has robbed them of childhoods with multiple overlapping local relationships that lead to local mentors. The backward aesthetics and broken social fabric have interrupted the very process that builds a culture. We have not just lost our sense of place, but a sense of who we are. James is very caustic, very funny, and very clever. But he is also very angry — a strong language warning applies!
The 1950’s super-highway scheme that went racist
Indeed, it gets worse. There where some racist ‘Urban Renewal’ projects aimed at driving super-highways though communities of colour. When GM and other car companies formed the National Highway User’s Conference, they convinced the American President to sign in the highway bill which gave highways about 90% Federal funding. The highways cut cities in half, back when they were ignorant of the benefits of walkable communities. The ‘Urban Renewal’ scheme maliciously tore down vital densely populated urban centres simply because they were black neighbourhoods! Suburbia was born in ignorance, grew on car corporation pork-barrelling, and maliciously tore down the old urban competition to itself in large part due to prejudice and racism!
In case you’re thoroughly depressed after that, now it’s time to cover something positive.